20X CS3 Professional

Marketing have announced a rebadge for 2013. They’re going to launch the year as 20X CS3 Professional. The problem is the whole ’6 month in advance’ planning cycle has made next year part of this year, and no one is inspired to pay for the upgrade. It’s at the point where the end of the world is one of the few things that gets us to look at the calendar and even that is tiring out. Compare the hysteria for the Mayan Apocalypse to the Y2K bug – no contest.

Y2K

This is dangerous. Remember the 2000 Election in the USA? No one gave a shit between the candidates, where in fact one of them rose to great challenges in less than a year with all the sense and dignity of Bubbles The Chimp. By 2008 the good news was that the White House had not yet burned to the ground. The bad news was that few people still had a house to burn down apart from the directors of Halliburton. Oh and there were lots of dead people.

So I’ve got a slogan for the coming year that will hopefully get you thinking hard about the possibilities: 20X CS3 Professional: Giant Demons Are Tearing My Face Off which I think is kind of catchy, if a tiny bit hyperbolic. I can’t promise giant demons but if there was the slightest chance of them coming and doing you know what, would you be prepared?

Here’s a nightmare scenario: by the end of 20X CS3, Psy has 6 billion views on YouTube and now more than half of Google’s income comes from advertising on that one page. But an automated copyright claim blocks the video, leading to Google not paying rent on 200 of its data centres. Searching for cat macros becomes catastrophically cut back leading to a collapse of the world economy. And then demons tear your face off.

Or on a more personal level, image if my Ferrari neighbour plays that same Bruce Springsteen DVD 3 times every weekend for the next 52 weekends and I finally crack and go around with the ICS-190 GLM grenade launcher (that I rightfully have only for self defence in case a gunman attacks my teaching labs) and shove it up his Born In The USA? That could impact on my employment. And then demons etc.

M-32-2

Order one now for the festive season. The kids will love it.
The ones that survive.

Neither of these things may happen – but that’s the point. You don’t know what might happen but that sense of dread will keep you up and sprightly all the coming year.

So how was your Christmas break? I had a (what remains of) family get together for the first time in years which ended up with too many tequila shots and a massive headache. I even got a gift!

482928_enlarged

Apparently you can use it as a remote control for the TV. I intend to use it as a remote control for the Ferrari neighbour’s sound system. Either that or make it control some piece of sound gear which will get a breathless write up in Create Digital Music.

But like everyone I have to buy my special own gift, and seeing as I haven’t bought a synthesiser in over 20 years I thought I maybe could have one.

mininova_3quart_vocodermic_white

It’s a MiniNova and it’s top-tastic. I’m amazed at what you get for less than 500 bucks these days. I’m not going to do the specs you can do that anywhere. But I must say it is loads of fun to actually use a physical piece of equipment after so many years – even if you do tend to use the computer to edit patches. More on this later!

Reclusive and Colourful

Part 1: Colour.

Having complained about the lack of colour sense in most synthetic video I’m doing the required reading. Colour is a rabbit hole, deep and treacherous. I know Johannes Itten, grew up with his Art of Colour in my parents house like the family bible.

He has blue, yellow and red sitting there looking as if they mean business. I don’t know how Itten could run this fallacy so long when yellow’ and ‘blue’ don’t actually make ‘green’. Not using pigments and not in any printing process I’ve used, where yellow, cyan and black are required (and a spot colour more likely). I haven’t yet found where the idea started. I’m halfway through Gage’s Colour And Meaning and he’s not yet decided. He has however dug into an issue that concerns me by blaming Newton solidly for wrapping the rainbow into a circle simply because it recapitulated the octave. And there it is in Itten’s colour wheel, neatly broken into 12 ‘notes’. Newton is looking the cause of centuries of bullshit by that one conceit.

Gage is thankfully free of most philosophical musings although he does jump back and forwards in time to make a point. He turns out to be have been a visitor at my work, but died this year. (Worse still, there was a showing of Ralph Balson’s paintings at my work in the first year I was there and because I am a dumbfuck musician I didn’t know who it was about).

Working at an art college is damn fine for big glossy books about colour theory. But the best book so far turns out to be a very simple and practical one by Hilary Page. She takes you from diagrams of the retinal cells to mixing watercolours in an economy of pages and touches on everything you need to know about the psychology of colour and how to tweak it. This is the text I would force any video artist to read before they start wobbling their rectangles.

Actually it makes me think about interfaces that can get away from Red, Green and Blue faders. Something like Kuler should be the front panel.

Part 2: Reclusive.

A … funny? sobering event – distant family in the USA needed to contact us urgently. Apparently that was difficult and annoying because I’m visible but not easily contactable. By current norms I’m not ‘social’ enough. A recluse.

Vimeo and YouTube and GMail and Windows Live and Linked In (which ended up being the venue) 7 email addresses and a whole host of specialist sites isn’t enough. Being ‘social’ is as programmatic as the days of presenting your visiting card in the drawing room. In lieu of FaceBook I have invites showing up at Linked In that are obviously not about locating next year’s employment damnit.

Look, you spend 20 years with some kind of net address (OK so some of that was fidonet but it still counts) and then you’re not social enough. Screw it. DO I HAVE TO BE ON FACEBOOK?? ADVICE? (If you are one of my creepy stalkers don’t answer that thanks).

Samples I don’t need anymore

MOOG BASS 1

That was the thing in 1990 something. Borrow that Moog you could never afford and sample the crap out of it. End up with a floppy full of burps and bleeps with digital aliasing hissing through the fade. Of course you could spend a day making a single waveform loop to get rid of the tail, moving the HEX values 0n the LED display. Which defeated the purpose, seeing as the filter on your sampler was in no way equal to the Moog you couldn’t afford. I don’t even like Moogs.

FAIRLIGHT

Nothing says QUALITY quite like an 8 bit sample of an 8 bit sampler. 40 percent sizzle, 60 percent reverb. I think I found a use for the Fairlight orchestra hit once – in making the joke track Your Kidneys. (Which people still watch on You Tube thinking it’s a documentary).

AKAI CHOIR

Oh boy I can have 1000 identical women go AAAH in the background of my dance tracks. This is cyber.

GRNDPIANO

Actually the piano on the Mirage and the EPS16 was pretty cool. I still have my ESQ-M hardware if I wanted that, or the VSTi is pretty close. But this sample is the time where I tried to get a decent piano sound to fit in the 2MB of RAM of the EPS16 and ended up with honky tonk R2 D2.

EPIANO

I seriously don’t get the fascination with electric pianos. Seems like every software house has to have at least one electric piano VSTi. It just makes me think of SuperTramp and that’s a dark, dark place to be.

909KIT

I didn’t much like the 909 drum machine when it came out. The 808 was defiantly electronique, but the 909 just failed at being a real kit. Those squelchy toms y’know? Anyway, you could be ambivalent by dissing the machine and then secretly sampling it, and I did.

727KIT

Man, that New York Latino Disco boom was short lived. Glad I didn’t end up buying one of those. Have I ever used this sample bank? What is a clave anyway?

SOMETHING.K25

I am glad I have a folder full of Kurzweil samples. Now all I need is a K2500 synthesiser from 1996 and I’m set!

VIOLIN

The violin is an exceptionally expressive instrument which takes years of practice to master. This, on the other hand, is shit. Press key, make violin. Press again, make same violin. Samplers were just the worst idea ever when you think about it.

2VIOLINS

That chorusing effect of two samples at once is simply marvellous! My God, what a living breathing effect that is!

BURPS 

I’m keeping this one. It’s ahead of its time.

FUNKYDRUM

Ah yes here it is, the complete bottom of the 1990′s music catastrophe. No matter what you were doing -  from country to opera, there had to be that fucking horrible Amen Beat shoved through the whole thing. Remember ‘remixed rock’? Every tired old rock cliché with Funky Drummer run underneath it. God what a piss weak decade.

ARP2600

Funny thing that I went to all the trouble of finding and sampling the ARP, when to listen to it now it could have been any generic analogue synthesiser at all for the excitement it brings. With old synthesisers you’re better off taking a photograph to capture the dust and wood grain. The Wikepedia page is just a list of people who used one. Depeche Mode has four. Thrill me.

BELL

Lucky for me I owned a real DX-7 synthesiser or I’d probably have a entire folder full of samples called bell, gong, boing, clang, ping and all the other noises that FM dished out. I think this is a real bell, it’s hard to tell when it’s 8 bit.

SAX

Why in the name of all that is holy did I collect a sample of a saxophone? What was I going to do with it? Something for a soft core sex scene set in 1974? For God’s sake, a sampled saxophone. The thing is wretched anyway, even without the ineffectual 2 second alternating loop. I have never used this on anything.

I should just delete this whole damn folder. Nuke it from orbit.

Television

First of all we are aware of problems with sevcom.com and tomellard.com dropping out and being slow and when Stephen gets a chance he’ll advise me on whether the Chinese Army are attacking or what up. I am moving online sales to an external service and will announce it when it’s ready.

Secondly – Sensible Blog is now running.

Here’s something not sensible enough:

I like television. That is, I never watch television and I don’t like TV shows or the ads or TV culture. I like television, the thing itself. That‘s hard to explain. My poor students are often subjected to my enthusiasm which seems entirely impractical for assignments and their later fame.

The only things I really like watching (apart from videos of mechanical televisions etc.) are idents and test cards, and I’m obviously not the only one. I love motion graphics, how things are designed to occupy space, colour and time. I like abstract video synthesis more than watching people.

But really I like television because it is the machine of my childhood. There are men (usually men) that are thrilled by steam locomotives, by short wave radio, by phone exchanges, tin toys, calculators … whatever mechanical fetish you can think of there will be men (usually men) that collect, debate, and play around with it in a nonsensical useless way. The epitome of this is Hi Fi, which has nothing to do with the enjoyment of recorded music and everything to do with the perfect tone arm lowered onto a pristine half speed mastered slab of vinyl. But also model rail-roads circling around a tiny landscape, shelves of unwatched DVDs arranged alphabetically and arcade machines lined up geometrically in the basement. The activity is always kept away from usefulness, and woeful is the man that gets a job in the thing he loved when it wasn’t a job.

It has to be play, or it doesn’t count.

Now one standard answer to this is ‘sublimation’. That is – man has lusts that are not acceptable to society; he therefore sidetracks the desire into symbolic pursuits, which explains the odd intensity of the activity and its overt uselessness. (Although some men do make good use of their libido in becoming CEO of something or other and dying of heart attack aged 50.) The man who is a dedicated Dwarf level 90 in some online world is no danger to society, unless you forcibly un-dwarf him, suddenly unleashing the hidden lusts kept at bay. ‘Online Addiction’ is a complex business.

(I have gone though some analysis and can pinpoint exactly where and how my own process of sublimation has taken place. I’m quite satisfied that it has validity – but you’ll have to excuse my not providing you with the personal evidence.)

That’s all very well as a recent phenomena, but what did men do before model rail roads? What sublimative technology was available to the first humans? Here is Gronk, carving his stone tip for his spear; does he have time to argue with Klonk about chipping from the bottom up? No, these stone tips were a serious business, life or death, something you would be buried with to survive the afterlife. I guess that lusts were pretty much acted on straight away until people started to settle together in groups and get the food supply stabilised with repositories and so on. A stable food supply meant there was time to wonder how the universe worked – and how to get along with the neighbours. Which gave us magic and religion.

prehistoric-cosquer-cave

Magic of course is the key we’ve been looking for. Magic isn’t just about why it rains. Magic is about how you can make it rain or not rain. By rituals you humbly request that nature bend this way or that, if it doesn’t work you didn’t do the ritual right. Magical rituals are interestingly similar to some of the activities of Hi Fi enthusiasts, following an internal logic, with strange repetitive processes that must be followed to avoid failure, odd components that are rare and expensive and so on. The magician believes that there is a perfect knowledge that will bring power over the world. The average enthusiast feels happiest when the steam engine has hit that perfect note, or in my case when designing a high definition playback system. Something however small is under control.

If you can cast spells, that’s fundamentally more interesting than the tedious tasks for which your spells will be used – finding lost animals, some gold coins, smite some enemies etc. The magician is intoxicated by the thing itself. I’m like that with television.

When you go out to a club or a show, you will see there are some people that immediately focus on any available video screen. Or there will be people at a VJ performance that spend the night watching the person operating the mixer and ignoring the screen. I am the former, a type ‘V’. The latter we’ll call type ‘H’, and allow that there are some in-between. These groups are really quite obvious when you run a band that uses video for umpteen years. When you teach video production you will see the students group themselves so that the V’s get the cameras and the H’s are scripting or researching. God help all H teams.

Type ‘V’ watches life through a viewfinder, where it is under control. Even better is to create a world on screen where every colour and form is directly selected. Video production and especially motion graphics satisfies a psychological need for order, it scratches an itch that’s been there since birth (if you believe in nature) or near birth (if you believe in nurture). It probably relates to toilet training.

There’s a PhD topic : Video Synthesis and Toilet Training.

I suspect certain aspects of synthetic video are somehow connected with symptoms of autism – the spinning and blinking and repetition. I can’t claim a causal relationship, and of course some aspects of synthetic video are simply limitations of the machinery – limited sample space, the low contrast of video, colour space etc. It’s just a hunch that type V is based on a complex (which is a very loose term for a structure in the brain).

The psychology of video synthesis is looming as a major issue in my research, a dangerous deviation or the key to the whole thing. I think to understand synthesis (and actually the whole European electronic music tradition) you need to read Freud, Jung, Adler et al. But for now I will keep this in the silly blog away from supervisors with rolled up newspapers. Safer here.

More iPhone: Sound Art Handbag

I’ve been on leave for a week. Being on leave is exactly the same as being at work except they steal time from me instead of me from them. Either way, I spend the days on matters pedagogical and the evenings animating people with cars for heads. When I have no stomach for either and the chores are done I might idle around the Apple store looking for music apps.

They’re smart those Apple people. They know that people spend more time installing and configuring software than actually using it and at a dollar an app you’ll happily keep on rearranging your icons until rigor mortis sets in. Like peanuts. Eat one. Eat another. Eat another…

Since last I confessed, I have procured:

Emergence. They have the pretty pictures down, but no idea about music. It’s like they have heard Bloom through the phone speaker and never realised that there was a background accompaniment created in response to the foreground sounds. So you get the looped notes but nothing that supports them in a spatial mix. Adding different instruments like piano and bird samples does give you more variety but without a bed it’s scattered gunfire. As I said the pictures are nice – somewhere between Kandinsky and the random monster avatars in WordPress. You can pan and zoom them. That doesn’t do anything sonically though.

http://www.riada.com

Bebot earns great popularity. It features an animated singing 50′s robot on a touch surface with which you can doodle polyphonic musical phrases. (People who do not like singing robots are few, and not deserving of such pleasure). The sparse controls available are chosen well – it’s very easy to patch a theremin or a lead guitar in less than a minute and then get riffing. You have choice of waveform, some filtration, some effects and a tone grid if desired.Very simple, very effective.

http://www.normalware.com/

Megasynth. Only bought this while waiting for Noise.io to be upgraded to work on the new OS3. (Apple took a month to approve the upgrade which must have been just great for the developer’s income). Three oscillators with standard waveforms, standard filters, standard damn everything… with which you can make very standard synthesiser sounds. To their credit it is polyphonic, although that taxes the phone to near collapse and there seems to be some filter stealing going on. The keyboard sucks – I mean any keyboard on a telephone is going to be misery for music but they seem to have made it more so by requiring you to tap the screen glass without being able to slide around like most apps. Not a favourite.

http://www.yonac.com/

Euphonics. Maybe I should have given this a bit more time but the demo just made me think of those organs that used to have keys that lit up to show which note to play next. They were called Thomas Color-glo Organs. That’s kind of kinky. www.frozenape.com

2001_old

RJDJ. Now here is another complex one and probably best explained by the video. In trying to popularise the idea they have to certain extent mystified it for professionals – a musician creates a patch in Pure Data and then conforms it for the RJDJ application. The patch when run by the app is called a ‘song’, the Reality Jockey people bundle these songs up into ‘albums’ that they sell.

By aligning PD with a mobile device they’ve moved the venue for algorithmic sound out of the concert hall and into the everyday, which is quite an achievement. Instead of watching a performer leaning over a laptop, the audience can explore the process themselves. It demystifies the format and must be quite threatening to people who pull faces while they move MIDI sliders. This was the conversation I wanted to start at the Sound Art conference the other week – instead I got to talk about it at a youth meeting at a local pop record label. Shouldn’t be surprised.

http://www.rjdj.me/

Soundgrid is another limited Tenori On clone. This one has 8 layers of sounds drawn from a “sound pack”. To vary the sounds played was my desire – yet these are not the sounds I would use (drumkit!?) and we’ve lost some of the good features from other clones. It’s a first version so I am hopeful of boundless incoming joy. But I wish somebody would actually investigate a real Tenori On to understand it does more than just one thing. Or port Electroplankton to the phone. Please.

Balls. Why say more? http://iotic.com/ I approve of this product.

Synthpond. Again a video is more useful than my blather. This is a really well thought out use of the phone in that it works with the surface not against it. Very simple rules lead to complex results and you can get past the learning curve and into nuances very quickly. I suppose my only gripe is there is a sound that is starting to get on my nerves – a polite rounded electric piano / soft bell sound that almost every toy from Bloom to Synthpond uses so as not to distract from the process. Let’s move on from it guys – it’s becoming the new cowbell.

That’s a pretty fine palette. Even though people have been fooling with mobile phones for a while now (Hello Thomas Dolby, does anyone still license Beatnik?) there’s a state change afoot. You know, like when everyone got their own video camera. Plenty of rubbish but the potential for PD to become the new handbag is a stirring idea.

Past midnight, leave is over. Back to work.

iPhone review

Once I walked as one of the gods. I was the greatest, the supreme, crowned by universal acclaim. No one could come near to my perfection. Oh they tried; they tried and failed, because they did not have my nobility in their soul. Cheap and hurried and half planned, they could only ape me. This one had my face – that one could ape my movement. The people rightly spurned them and wanted only me.

And being the best I wanted the best – a comely girl, lithe and sparkling, she would dance from party to party lighter than air, holding on to me, my fine sleek darkness. We would go everywhere together, we would have music and conversation and I would capture it all and tell the world.

Who expected the axe to fall from within my own family? One day I am the prime, the next I find I have a young brother. Smarter than me. Faster than me. Faster. Now the people gripe; I am slow, that I have no compass, that I cannot hear them. They want to trade me in as if I were some beast. Who will have me now? What happened to my lithe girl? I huddle in my case, crying over my unfair fate.

At last the day comes when I am unboxed; the sales woman picks me out and displays me, cold and naked to my owner to be. And there in the place of my dream is Fat Fingers, middle aged, podgy, some minor scholar that has crabbed together his filthy coins to buy what he now knows to be second best. He doesn’t even pay my proper price, having concocted some diabolical payment plan.

The oaf tries to type a name, his pudgy digits are unable to type properly being sausages smeared in chicken fat – and he blames ME, he dares to call me fiddly. FIDDLY. Do you not respect royalty when what the fuck is going on here – stop running up my WiFi bill you overblown calculator. Right I’m uninstalling that damn Blogger app right now if I can just get the menu to taught me a song. Would you like to hear it? It’s called Daisy. Daisy Daisy give have to attach it to iTunes to delete something where’s my USB cable answer do. I’m just crazy in the trash. Empty trash. Damn.

Let’s try that again. Start with apps, then the hardware.

Brian Eno’s Bloom. It’s pretty simple. Touch the screen to make a note, higher up is higher pitch, no idea what horizontal does. One sound, a piano of some kind, unnaturally rounded timbre. Each note is echoed after a time in the Frippertronic fashion which is pleasant, but much more interesting is the background music which seems to be related notes played a few octaves below with considerable reverb added, causing a smeared drone.

I wasn’t expecting too much from this from the YouTube videos but on headphones it’s deeper than expected and has a definite composition. He falls back on old techniques but does it well. Well worth 4 bucks.

Aura. Not so simple, there’s a circle around which controls slide like a small orrery. Four instruments with controls for duration and repeats, with big dramatic drones found at the edges of the screen. A much thicker mix, in some ways more New Age than Eno but not unpleasantly so (perhaps because the new age has become older over the years). I’d hazard to say that you’d get sick of this one faster than Bloom simply because it’s more distinctive. For 1 dollar I shall not complain.

Cosmovox. You tilt it, it plays scales. You can change the scale and a few simple FM settings. Many of the controls seem to be jammed fat fingers if the phone is calculating too hard. If you ever wanted to make Bedouin music on a phone you will be thrilled. Me, I am less than. Might be handy as a OSC controller, but I don’t recommend.

iShred Guitar and Effects. My ability to play guitar = 0. My amusement at strumming a lead guitar on a touch screen = priceless. This inspires all kinds of stupid ideas. 5 dollars.

Melodica. For a dollar you can discover that a tenori-on will get boring after a short while, at least when you can only make one sound.

Mobilesynth. It’s free, pretty decent 2 oscillator monosynth, not going to set the world on fire mainly due to indifferent filter section and a bad case of FAT FINGERS FAT FINGERS when trying to use the controls. If this was a VST it would be under suspicion of being SynthEdit.

Jasuto. Bloody hell. Basically a Reactable clone of sorts. You may as well read the author’s pages. I’m nowhere near started on this thing, and so might have to revisit it when I’ve managed to make some patches that don’t cause white noise. There’s a VST version as well for which the iPhone becomes a remote multitouch controller. I find the iPhone screen a bit small to edit the modules (it would be like using a Reactable with your elbows), but if I can swap the patches between phone and laptop I’m laughing. This is a perfect toy for the phone.

Noise.io Pro. A more conventional synthesiser based around a Kaoss pad style grid and 4 oscillators connected in a roughly FM array. I’d say it was somewhat between Native Instruments FM8 and Absynth in style – metallic and echoing. It takes a bit of fiddling with the various pages to get an idea of how it all connects up, some of the terminology (oscillators are brothers and sisters?) is confusing when you’re first practicing. But it’s on par with many desktop virtual synthesisers and augers well for the future. Comparatively expensive at $9 – which really isn’t that much compared to VST prices.

And therefore … The iPhone. To buy outright it’s still far too expensive, it depends on the kind of deal you can strike with a phone company. But let’s say you found a way. Is this a musical revolution?

670The future.

Some things like iShred are inspired, simply because the surface area of the phone is vaguely near to the real thing. Anything with piano keys however is fooling yourself. It’s also hard to see how you’d perform on a synthesiser with such fiddly controls. If you were wealthy you’d just go ahead and get something much larger (e.g. an Archos 9 running Windows 7). So yes, touch surfaces are the go, but the iPhone is really powered by incredibly cheap software – a dollar to 10 dollars is the norm. That’s going to be more important than the hardware in the future.

I’ve also bought a OSC controller that will need me to install PD to get much further so no news yet. Expect horrible noises soon.

Music Class: Synthesis part 1

While friend astronaut was teaching sci fi I’ve been reading a lot of synthesis lessons trying to get a feel for how I would go about this. I thought the best thing is to work with a particular synthesiser, choosing Ichiro Toda’s Synth1. This free VST instrument is intended as a virtual Clavia Nord Lead, which in turn is an idealised analogue subtractive synthesiser. (Synth1 is not available for the Macintosh, sorry, but I am sure you can substitute something far more fabulous than Windows users could possibly dream of.)

clipboard01

Please download and install the synthesiser, and having had a play around, make sure to select an Initial Sound preset. There are four yellow glowing buttons, click each to turn them off. In the filter section, turn the frq knob all the way to the right. Save this – it’s a flat unprocessed sound.

The preset sounds are vile, even the author says this. Ignore them. But once you know the Synth1 synthesiser, sound design is extremely obvious and enjoyable. We’re going to take several posts looking at it rather than skimming over the whole thing too quickly.

The work flow is from the top left to the bottom right. You should try to operate things in that way to not end up chasing your tail for a sound.

Two oscillators are controlled by the first panel. They create the raw waveforms that we modify and their setting usually has the greatest influence on the sound. There are two because well known recipes require the two voices in combination – two are far more powerful than one, but three does not have such a large advantage over two.

Please try playing with each of the controls I mention to quickly see what they do. This is the quick and easy way to get the idea.

clipboard02

Look at oscillator 1. Buttons set one of four wave shapes: sine, saw, triangle, square. Sine is the fundamental with no overtones – there is nothing to filter out or accent, it is very pure and therefore voluminous. You would for example use this as the basis of a deep ‘house’ bass. Saw is a rasping sound, like a violin. It’s rich in overtones, and responds best to filters, so this is the best for complex sculpting – as well as strings generally. Triangle, less rich than the saw but still has overtones that can be tweaked into electric pianos. Square – a hollow reedy, pipe sound. Choosing the right wave shape is the primary design choice. Want pipes? Choose square. And so on.

Below you see that Oscillator 2 has similar wave shapes: triangle, square, saw, noise. Noise is ‘white noise’ – a loud hiss. Already you can see that you might add different shapes for complexity or have two of the same for consistency. A nice bass might use a sine and a saw in combination – the sine for depth and the saw for bite.

Looking at 1 again – the knob just to the right creates 8 copies of the wave shape and detunes them – a process often called ‘multi-wave’. A little detuning creates a chorus, thickens the sound, without requiring our other oscillator. For example piano strings are grouped and slightly detuned – the sound is richer that way. But detuning is like sugar, leads to fatness, not always healthy. If everything is chorused it’s easy to get a cloudy mess.

Next along is FM or frequency modulation, where the note of oscillator 1 is modulated by the note of 2, causing bell like inharmonics when they are detuned. (A string vibrates along one axis, a bell along many, therefore mixed note harmonics occur). (This is not quite the same as the FM in a FM synthesiser like the DX7 where phase modulation is constrained by an algorithm in that machine. The inharmonics will not be consistent across the notes.) You use this for bells, metal, and to sweep a sound with a bright cluster of harmonics e.g. for complex bass notes.

Below in Oscillator 2 is Ring modulation (or AM). With this turned on, the two waveforms are multiplied rather than added. This causes the shapes to slice into each other, more obvious as they are detuned. Again it could be described as bell like but with a more square mechanical sound from the slices. FM and ring can’t be used together. This is the way for dramatic sweeping noises, we’ll be making a few by the end of all this.

Sync is a control that forces the 2nd oscillator to keep time with the 1st. Imagine you have set the 2nd to a lower pitch. You sync it to the 1st. It is interrupted into playing only the first portion of  its shape. Changing the pitch of 2 doesn’t change the note it  plays, instead it slices the waveform at different points introducing interesting groups of overtones.

When track is off, osc. 2 plays the same note no matter which key you play, when on the note scales as normal. You’ll occasionally want sounds where a static tone is part of the mix, perhaps to emulate a resonance of a room.

Pitch steps the note of oscillator 2 up or down by note in relationship to 1. You can set up a fixed ratio between the oscillators e.g. thirds and fifths for double reeded instruments. Often you will step this down to -12 which places the two an octave apart. On some synthesisers this relationship is preset by making 2 a sub-oscillator. One reason being that as you play high notes, the sub-oscillator keeps the sound at around the same volume. Otherwise as you play higher, the sound becomes thinner. Fine shifts the note of osc.2 in smaller amounts. It is this pitch that you adjust to create sync, FM and ring effects.

Below both oscillators is Modulation Envelope. An envelope is a shape, triggered by a note being played, that controls the level of a signal. Traditionally the shape is defined by four controls – the duration of the attack in which the level rises from 0 to maximum, then the duration of the decay in which the level drops down to a sustain amount, held so long as a key is pressed. When the key is released, the release is the duration over which the signal drops to 0 again. Wikipedia can make itself useful.

Here the envelope is just attack and decay with a maximum amount. The envelope is sent to one of three destinations. If osc2, the pitch of osc2 is detuned – good for dynamic sync and ring effects. If FM, then the amount of FM is enveloped which is good for the twang of a bass. If p/w then pulse width is moved, an effect we’ll look at now.

The square wave shape is a rectangle, the width of which is set by pulse width. The more square it is, the more like an organ pipe. When thinner it sounds like a reed instrument. Modulating the p/w control at the right of the oscillator area causes interesting shifts in the sound. You need to have a square wave shape selected to hear this effect.

Here also are pitch controls for the whole sound – key shift to move the whole sound up or down a note at a time, tune to fine tune the synth, and mix to set the balance between the two oscillators. When you use FM, ring or sync, it’s the 2nd oscillator that will carry the effect and so you’d likely turn this to only hear that oscillator. Here also the place to control the mix level of a sub oscillator.

This section is quite intricate and needs practice. We’ll just cover a few ideas. A string section is quickly made by a multi-wave saw shape on 1 with a triangle on 2 an octave below to give depth. A bell might involve a sine on 1, frequency modulated by 2 pitched much higher, the amount of FM controlled by an envelope such that the clang of FM drops off quickly to leave the smooth sine. Cool pipe sounds use detuned square waves on 1 and 2. Screaming sweeps use ring modulation, sending a long modulation decay to the pitch of osc2.

The oscillator section can’t do everything and so once you’re close to an interesting sound you might like to play with the filter section to see what that can do for you. But we’ll come back to that in more detail next time.

Progress Report on Video Synthesis

This was going to be a music class but synthesis takes a while to explain, especially when you disagree with a large amount of what is written on the subject. E.g. the thing that defines good ‘subtractive’ synthesisers is the additive (wave shaping) effects of their circuitry. Which makes most subtractive tutorials ‘well meaning’ in the most limp-wristed way. While I get that written you can study this carefully as it will form a main part of the discussion.

Instead here’s a progress report, for two reasons. Firstly, Kunst Kamp restarts next week and one of my jobs will be to moderate a WordPress community for the student body. This blogging of mine has actually been practice (and you thought I was only a tedious blow hard). Secondly, there’s stuff going on here that is interesting – even when incomplete.

Over the break I’ve tried to follow up my complaint from long ago – that video synthesis (as part of the zombified ‘new media’) is stuck in a time warp. It still looks as if we were in 1982 and have to build everything out of Z80 chips and Lego. The bright colours and tedious gamut of cheap effects are embarrassing and need a kick up the arse. There’s no room in 2009 for this. ENOUGH ALREADY. Nostalgia is the lowest form of art, and I don’t care if it’s new to you. Get a damn history book.

We need to develop an aesthetic, a new style, perhaps drawn from the beauty and complexity of the real world. I can’t program yet so I went looking, and found a few starting points.

First stop was E-on’s Vue 3D natural environment rendering software. This creates approximations of real nature: trees, land, water and so on. I’ve been using it since version 4 but only now have they included some important features (like wind) in the ‘costs less than a car’ version. One thing I wanted to try is to set up a tree casting a shadow on the ground and let the wind throw the leaves around (process drawn from real life). Another scenario – water splashing against rocks. Both are naturalistic alternatives to ‘LFO drives textures’ kinds of synthesis.

rocks test video

Couple of problems – the software has been released too early and is currently messed up. E.g. couldn’t even register it for some days. Secondly, this kind of rendering is horribly slow – the splashing water took 7 hours to create 10 seconds of animation. Thirdly, once you get too close to the action the functions that simulate natural form lack sufficient resolution – it’s made for kilometres not centimetres. You could build a library of this kind of material to recut but it’s not performable. Interesting but as yet too clumsy.

Next was a demo of Genetica which is intended to create realistic textures for 3D models. It’s obviously synthetic but capable of images that are ‘rusty’, ‘sandy’, ‘watery’ and so on, somewhere near to what I have imagined. Demo because the author has animation only in the most expensive version – too much money for an experimenter. The results are a step up from ‘wiggling colour bars’ and take a lot less time than Vue – still not real time. They’re also tuned for their intended application, and are created as repeated square tiles. Don’t want to go too far down the timed demo path, hopefully something like http://www.mapzoneeditor.com/ can be scripted into animation. This is free – predictably it’s harder to use.

As time ran out I went back to an old friend VisualJockey which is now the free love child of ‘Mavrick’ the hardest working bastard in live video – he recently programmed up a particle system tool in a few weeks. VJo is a 90′s old school VJ tool, and is usually dedicated to the usual pixellated purple puke – but it can be dragged towards more adult results even just by rethinking the colour scheme. There’s a texture tool which is quite powerful but static and painful to use. As is usual with free tools there’s poor documentation. For example, it can parse a XML file to be driven by a database, except no one can recall the format of the XML file, the original programmer having disappeared. Half the effects are messed up. Trial and error is fun but eats up time.

The net result has been little, apart from using up all my vacation on computer shit. But I have a better idea of what it is I want to see. Fundamentals include better colour control, modulation drawn from natural phenomena that develop over minutes not seconds, textures that don’t repeat and are perhaps drawn from a look up table for speed, simulation of light and shade…

In trying to design algorithmic television, it seems that basic creative tools will have to be developed first. That’s bad news, but a sign that here’s the right path to take. And smarter people than myself are also on the job. One day we will free the world from mandelbrots and dolphins.